ARGAHERGARGHARHRG FUCKING VCAA
they make 2007 hard then over compensate and make 08 rediculously easy. Which means getting a 50 will need like 117+/120... or something sigh...
Anyway, I noticed a few flaws in the exam;
1.
The one about the reactivity of direct observation being higher or lower - they did not state whether or not the observer was visible to the children or how many times he/she had observed - so reactivity is unclear. I ended up choosing higher, assuming that the observer was visible.
2.
the question about AFTER a period of aerobic training. That during a 3km time trial, the subjects' HR levels would "increase", "decrease" or be "unchanged".
I answered decrease because, indirect testing that is not conducted in the lab generally has a sub-maximal/non-maximal intensity, thus the intensity during the 3km time trial would be sub-maximal in nature as well. A chronic adaption to aerobic is decreased resting and SUB-MAX HRs... so after the training period (of 3 months was it?) they would have lower sub-max HRs during the same time-trial... props if you read all that LOL
Also, did anyone continuously write beyond the given space/lines... I found myself doing that on almost every question even though my hand writing is not very big...
And since I finished early I copied down my multi choice answers:
D A B A C B D A A C C D A B D