Angry protests over a film made in the United States that mocks the Prophet Mohammed have spread to Australia, with a large demonstration outside the US consulate in Sydney.Yeah guys show them how peaceful you are. Don't conform to stereotypes or anything.
Looks like it is a porno.
The f did I just read? If people hadn't been killed over this I would have called this simply a pathetic circus. Now its like really serious shit. A making of a film trailer causing people to get killed and families torn apart? this is depressing.
“It’s really heartbreaking, it’s very emotional. I know the morning after the attack, I just sat there and cried. This is not what we fought so hard for. Toppling Qadaffi was something really big and we rose in the eyes of many across the world. It’s so hard, as a Libyan-American, to be dealing with this right now when we’ve worked so hard to get where we are.”
Muslims take their religion seriously why make this movie?I think the movie was extremely stupid.. however I support their freedom to make it. The fact of the matter is we can't let freedom of speech that is one of the foundations of our civilization be trumped just because a bunch of thugs get butthurt and can't take criticism.
It's like the movie makers are asking for these repercussions.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A2z6pAiCIAA5Z7g.jpg)
Stay classy, radical Islam bogans!
I disagree. The movie is targeting a man who is highly respected in the Islamic religion.Muslims take their religion seriously why make this movie?I think the movie was extremely stupid.. however I support their freedom to make it. The fact of the matter is we can't let freedom of speech that is one of the foundations of our civilization be trumped just because a bunch of thugs get butthurt and can't take criticism.
It's like the movie makers are asking for these repercussions.
It's also symptomatic of the fact that of all the religions, Islam is the one that tends to overreact dramatically to any (perceived) slight, which makes freedom of speech a mockery.They react that way because they get genuinely offended by any disrespect towards their religious leader.
i'm not saying it does. I'm simply stating why they do what they do.Which shouldn't contravene the rights of others to criticise the religion.
I guess loyalty plays a vital role in that case.i'm not saying it does. I'm simply stating why they do what they do.Which shouldn't contravene the rights of others to criticise the religion.
People's religious beliefs are such a protected concept, it's interesting to see zealous defense. Like. A restaurant owner might believe his restaurant is the best, better than the other restaurants, live and breath his restaurants and love it more than his parents and himself yet it is acceptable for a food critic to shred that restaurant to shreds. It's interesting to see the different standards that apply to religious belief.
Notice that Muslims are the most confronted people in the world.
That would be hilarious to say the least.Notice that Muslims are the most confronted people in the world.
Can you please confront a Buddhist and let me know how that goes?
The difference here though is people are taking offence, when honestly it should just be the mentality of shrug your shoulders and walk away.
I still think it's rubbish, if they're insulted by something like this, then I don't really know what to say to them.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A20hNe6CEAA0wE0.png:large)Is Andrew Bolt serious.. cause I'm not sure if his trolling. How is 100 people protesting with hatred representative of the majority of Muslims in Australia?
I don't think anyone saw this coming. ::)
Well, this type of sensationalist article is hardly out of character for him.(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A20hNe6CEAA0wE0.png:large)Is Andrew Bolt serious.. cause I'm not sure if his trolling. How is 100 people protesting with hatred representative of the majority of Muslims in Australia?
I don't think anyone saw this coming. ::)
I agree with you, Soul_Khan, we also must condemn violent action. Just because some idiot decides to go and make a controversial movie does not mean that an attack on other innocent people are justified.
It's also symptomatic of the fact that of all the religions, Islam is the one that tends to overreact dramatically to any (perceived) slight, which makes freedom of speech a mockery.
I wouldn't be offended enough to go murdering people (much less people who have ZERO association with the actual movie apart from the fact that they might share a nationality)
The US Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three staff members at the US consulate in Benghazi were deliberately murdered Tuesday night Sept 11 just after memorial ceremonies were held in America for the victims of the 9/11 outrage. debkafile’s counter-terror sources report exclusively that far from being a spontaneous raid by angry Islamists, it was a professionally executed terrorist operation by a professional Al Qaeda assassination team, whose 20 members acted under the orders of their leader Ayman al Zawahri after special training. They were all Libyans, freed last year from prisons where they were serving sentences for terrorism passed during the late Muammar Qaddafi’s rule.
In a video tape released a few hours before the attack, Zawahri called on the faithful to take revenge on the United States for liquidating one of the organization’s top operatives, Libyan-born Abu Yahya al-Libi in June by a US drone in northwestern Pakistan.
Its release was the “go” signal for the hit team to attack the US diplomats in Benghazi.
To mask their mission, they stormed the consulate on the back of a violent protest by hundreds of Islamists against a film said to insult Prophet Muhammed produced by a Florida real estate agent called Sam Bacile, who has been described as of Israeli origin.
These protests in sydney are disgusting. I look at the newspaper and see some 4 year old kid holding up a sign that I am not even going to post on here about what it said. Children should not be brainwashed into promoting such violence.
I'm sorry but this has just crossed the line, Australia is renowned for being a peaceful country and we welcome people from all over the world just to get our policemen injured as a result of religion. Honestly this has gone too far and makes me sick to my stomach.
These protests in sydney are disgusting. I look at the newspaper and see some 4 year old kid holding up a sign that I am not even going to post on here about what it said. Children should not be brainwashed into promoting such violence.
I'm sorry but this has just crossed the line, Australia is renowned for being a peaceful country and we welcome people from all over the world just to get our policemen injured as a result of religion. Honestly this has gone too far and makes me sick to my stomach.
Sorry... I already posted it above :(
Liberation narratives are always awkward and rarely accurate. Those who assist in toppling dictators tend to leave the ground fresh for another insurrection. The flipside of the Arab Spring is fundamentalist usurpation. Chatter about democracy is meaningless when the institutional will is absent. The new Libyan regime has been supported by Western governments, but it lives precariously.
All that mob violence generally requires is a vague pretext to bolster a lynching. What that pretext was in the Benghazi killings is not entirely clear. Was it the noxious video Innocence of Muslims, made by a real-estate developer and promoted by Koran-burning preacher Terry Jones? Or was mob violence a gift on the anniversary of the September 11 2001 attacks, orchestrated with devastating effect?
US officials have taken it upon themselves to investigate what motivated the attacks. It will not require the gifted and the intelligent to discern some of the causes. Innocence of Muslims is merely a sideshow to both the way American power is projected and the Muslim world’s own problems, though it provides a pungent distraction for troubled communities. It also shows that mobilised groups of revolt can be formed rapidly, bypassing official channels and imperilling stability.
Islamophobia in the US, trumpeted by Jones and backed by such figures as the Egyptian-American lawyer Morris Sadek, provides one side of the equation. The counter is provided by such organised efforts as seen in Benghazi. Both sides nourish each other’s assertions of intolerance. The power of these unofficial protests has reached such a level that General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the US Joints Chief of Staff, personally called Jones to demand that he stop promoting the film.
Hell, if you believe that this is simply a result of the so called trailer after informing yourself about the situation, you've got as big rocks in your head as some of the people who result to violence simply because they were offended. It's clear the attack on the embassy and the death of the ambassador just wasn't over the movie though.
Everyone is ignoring the obvious geopolitical dimensions here or haven't even bothered to fully inform themselves (bit of an irony then hey).
People hated the USA way before this film came out. Now is just a convenient time.
No one should offend these people because they clearly don't accept it.
I can't understand how any one of these fundamentalists can possibly blame America/the West for this video which was clearly made by a random idiot and not state sponsored at all. To those protesting the video, and somehow seeing it as the responsibility of a western nation to enforce what people put on youtube need to leave western democracies and enjoy their oppressed lives in theocratic shitholes. The sheer stupidity of these protests is astounding.They have a right to be angry and offended. They do not live oppressed lives in theocratic "shitholes". I lived in Lebanon for half my life. Never felt "oppressed."
Muslims need to absolutely lighten up a bit, seriously. We can't portray Mohammed in a cartoon or a damn picture without getting these violent reactions from these fundamentalists.. why don't we get the same reaction when South Park and Family Guy for example portray Jesus in a negative light? We are allowed to criticize every other religion out there, but somehow when it comes to Islam the stupidity of political correctness and the status quo disable us from doing so.. stuff that!. Every ideology whether it be religious, political or philosophical should and must be criticized whether it be in an article, a documentary, a comic, or a cartoon.I can't understand how any one of these fundamentalists can possibly blame America/the West for this video which was clearly made by a random idiot and not state sponsored at all. To those protesting the video, and somehow seeing it as the responsibility of a western nation to enforce what people put on youtube need to leave western democracies and enjoy their oppressed lives in theocratic shitholes. The sheer stupidity of these protests is astounding.They have a right to be angry and offended. They do not live oppressed lives in theocratic "shitholes". I lived in Lebanon for half my life. Never felt "oppressed."
The people rioting in Sydney are complete idiots. They took it too far. They humiliated Muslims all around the world. They are, however, a minority.
I can't understand how any one of these fundamentalists can possibly blame America/the West for this video which was clearly made by a random idiot and not state sponsored at all. To those protesting the video, and somehow seeing it as the responsibility of a western nation to enforce what people put on youtube need to leave western democracies and enjoy their oppressed lives in theocratic shitholes. The sheer stupidity of these protests is astounding.They have a right to be angry and offended. They do not live oppressed lives in theocratic "shitholes". I lived in Lebanon for half my life. Never felt "oppressed."
The people rioting in Sydney are complete idiots. They took it too far. They humiliated Muslims all around the world. They are, however, a minority.
Actually the only theocratic countries in the middle east are : Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Mauritania, Oman and Iran. Besides the countries i listed many Islamic countries adopt democratic ideologies.I can't understand how any one of these fundamentalists can possibly blame America/the West for this video which was clearly made by a random idiot and not state sponsored at all. To those protesting the video, and somehow seeing it as the responsibility of a western nation to enforce what people put on youtube need to leave western democracies and enjoy their oppressed lives in theocratic shitholes. The sheer stupidity of these protests is astounding.They have a right to be angry and offended. They do not live oppressed lives in theocratic "shitholes". I lived in Lebanon for half my life. Never felt "oppressed."
The people rioting in Sydney are complete idiots. They took it too far. They humiliated Muslims all around the world. They are, however, a minority.
You can be angry and offended without killing people and rioting. But most importantly, you direct that anger towards the people who made the film, not the "west' in general which is incredibly dumb. With that said, and I can't emphasize this enough, the person who made that movie was within his rights to make it. There are just as bad movies made about Christian's and Jews, but they do not react in the same way. As you said, they're a minority, but the fact that so many people try and justify their actions rather then denounce them (not saying it's you) makes me lose a bit of faith in humanity.
Anyway, those people rioting are the only people I referred to, in my post I didn't once say that they represented all muslims. Imo, many countries in the middle east are very much theocratic and I think Islam plays a very large role in determining the legal system in many such countries, but that's neither here nor there.
This is why we shouldn't even have religion in the first place, there would be nothing to hate (eliminating the initial problem) and the issues of aggression would also be more or less curbed.
Actually the only theocratic countries in the middle east are : Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Mauritania, Oman and Iran. Besides the countries i listed many Islamic countries adopt democratic ideologies.I can't understand how any one of these fundamentalists can possibly blame America/the West for this video which was clearly made by a random idiot and not state sponsored at all. To those protesting the video, and somehow seeing it as the responsibility of a western nation to enforce what people put on youtube need to leave western democracies and enjoy their oppressed lives in theocratic shitholes. The sheer stupidity of these protests is astounding.They have a right to be angry and offended. They do not live oppressed lives in theocratic "shitholes". I lived in Lebanon for half my life. Never felt "oppressed."
The people rioting in Sydney are complete idiots. They took it too far. They humiliated Muslims all around the world. They are, however, a minority.
You can be angry and offended without killing people and rioting. But most importantly, you direct that anger towards the people who made the film, not the "west' in general which is incredibly dumb. With that said, and I can't emphasize this enough, the person who made that movie was within his rights to make it. There are just as bad movies made about Christian's and Jews, but they do not react in the same way. As you said, they're a minority, but the fact that so many people try and justify their actions rather then denounce them (not saying it's you) makes me lose a bit of faith in humanity.
Anyway, those people rioting are the only people I referred to, in my post I didn't once say that they represented all muslims. Imo, many countries in the middle east are very much theocratic and I think Islam plays a very large role in determining the legal system in many such countries, but that's neither here nor there.
This is why we shouldn't even have religion in the first place, there would be nothing to hate (eliminating the initial problem) and the issues of aggression would also be more or less curbed.I think that there will always be something people will fight over. If religion were removed, people would use something else as the spark for their rage.
Or the reason for the mistreatment.This is why we shouldn't even have religion in the first place, there would be nothing to hate (eliminating the initial problem) and the issues of aggression would also be more or less curbed.I think that there will always be something people will fight over. If religion were removed, people would use something else as the spark for their rage.
In Syria, Bashar Al-Assad's remarkably sectarian government looks likely to be violently overthrown, not because of his religious views, but because of his treatment Syria's people. Almost all conflicts are started by unfair treatment on a side, and religion is so often used as a scapegoat.
Perhaps, but not in this case. His government was praised for little- if any- discrimination on the basis of religion.Or the reason for the mistreatment.This is why we shouldn't even have religion in the first place, there would be nothing to hate (eliminating the initial problem) and the issues of aggression would also be more or less curbed.I think that there will always be something people will fight over. If religion were removed, people would use something else as the spark for their rage.
In Syria, Bashar Al-Assad's remarkably sectarian government looks likely to be violently overthrown, not because of his religious views, but because of his treatment Syria's people. Almost all conflicts are started by unfair treatment on a side, and religion is so often used as a scapegoat.
I'm not at all religious, but it's a bit unfair to pin it on religion when it should be pinned on extremists and those can't can't control their emotions instead.
And we both know that removing religion is not going to happen.
Protest Fashion (via Reddit)
http://imgur.com/a/Vxi3p
Oh man. Does anyone else get the urge to make a satirical ad campaign for these brands?I'd rather a sartorial ad campaign.
...and I feel for the peaceful Muslims whose name is being tarnished by these extremists.A strict reading of the Quran, the traditional scholar's interpretation,and the hadith suggests that they're actions aren't condemned by the good book. Considering that the peaceful verses were abrogated by the later more violent verses in the Quran, I don't see how any moderate and peaceful muslim can convince a strict Imam (who have all the control of the people btw) to choose the way of peace. Just look at the imams in Saudia Arabia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iran, etc. and you will see that those who are hardcore fundamentalists (taking every word of the Quran and the hadith extremely seriously) generally endorse these violent acts (especially towards Jews).
This is why moderate Islam is a joke - because it's simply not a true representation of the religion.
I'm not complaining that there are no peaceful Muslims - but peaceful Muslims are those who don't take the Quran and Hadith seriously.
I can garauntee you for a fact that those who were protesting in Sydney were the ones who took their religion seriously (going to the mosque continually, reading the quran, reading the hadith, etc.) and those at home watching their fellow brothers and sisters in Islam make a fool of themselves didn't.
I have to say i disagree. I can assure you 75% of those protesting in Sydney don't even pray their 5 daily prayers....and I feel for the peaceful Muslims whose name is being tarnished by these extremists.A strict reading of the Quran, the traditional scholar's interpretation,and the hadith suggests that they're actions aren't condemned by the good book. Considering that the peaceful verses were abrogated by the later more violent verses in the Quran, I don't see how any moderate and peaceful muslim can convince a strict Imam (who have all the control of the people btw) to choose the way of peace. Just look at the imams in Saudia Arabia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iran, etc. and you will see that those who are hardcore fundamentalists (taking every word of the Quran and the hadith extremely seriously) generally endorse these violent acts (especially towards Jews).
This is why moderate Islam is a joke - because it's simply not a true representation of the religion.
I'm not complaining that there are no peaceful Muslims - but peaceful Muslims are those who don't take the Quran and Hadith seriously.
I can garauntee you for a fact that those who were protesting in Sydney were the ones who took their religion seriously (going to the mosque continually, reading the quran, reading the hadith, etc.) and those at home watching their fellow brothers and sisters in Islam make a fool of themselves didn't.
Can you please explain to my why is it we see this type of violent reaction ONLY from Muslims?*Predominantly from muslims. Anders Beverik is an example of a Christian believer that committed largescale murder. He was more anti-Islamic than he was against multiculturalism. From his manifesto, he had no problem associating with an African, so long as he was Christian.
Why don't you delete the damn film? What purpose does it serve anyway? Why doesn't anyone see how HURT the Muslims are by this? Why doesn't anyway see as an obvious attack on all of us?
Yes but that's quite different since Anders Beverik did not commit those acts because he was offended by a YouTube film or a cartoon insulting Jesus rather it was out of his own prejudice and hate towards muslims and multiculturalism in general.Can you please explain to my why is it we see this type of violent reaction ONLY from Muslims?*Predominantly from muslims. Anders Beverik is an example of a Christian believer that committed largescale murder. He was more anti-Islamic than he was against multiculturalism. From his manifesto, he had no problem associating with an African, so long as he was Christian.
As to why Muslims are generally the violent ones, only the US has a culture that holds freedom of speech sacrosanct. Most arab nations don't share the same sentiment which is evident in the enacting of blasphemy laws. Since murder for blasphemy is sanctioned by the state, it wouldn't be a stretch to say that the citizens would view it as a justifiable act.
SHOULD THE MOVIE HAVE BEEN MADE? NO
SHOULD THE SYDNEY PROTEST TURNED VIOLENT? NO I really wish that it hadn't perhaps then, just maybe, maybe, one or two people would have realized the stupidity of this film and have backed them up. MAYBE.
IS MUSLIM ANGER JUSTIFIED? YES
WHY ISN'T ANYONE ELSE AGAINST THE MAKING OF THE FILM? BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO BUSY SPREADING WORDS OF HATE ABOUT ISLAM, BELIEVE THAT FREEDOM OF SPEECH MEANS ONE CAN DO WHATEVER THEY LIKE EVEN IF IT HURTS SOMEONE ALTHOUGH IF THIS HAD BEEN AGAINST SOME OTHER RELIGION I'M 1000% THEY WOULD RESPOND THE SAME WAY AND YOU KNOW WHAT NO ONE WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT THE RESPONSE THEY WOULD'VE REMOVED THE MOVIE ALREADY.
What i;ve come to realise is that Muslim's aren't becoming anti western but westerner's are becoming anti-Islamic which is clearly evident through the comments they make and the large numbers that make them. You don't have to look far to notice this.
People also keep saying that they have made stuff like this for 'every religion' which is utter bullshit, no one has ever made a film just focused on denigrating a religion and its people. This film was clearly spreading the word of hate (which i think it got across quite readily) and had no other purpose. So clearly it shouldn't exist but living in this time, where people are becoming anti-Islamic (admit or not) everyone is supporting it instead and finding entertainment in watching people get hurt over this.
Here is another article you guys left out:
Growing backlash
Police are investigating a Facebook page calling for "Aussies" to retaliate against Muslim protests, which had 732 "likes" at 8.15am yesterday before it was taken down.
"People should be aware that the dissemination of (inciting) material is unacceptable and ... appropriate action will be taken," a police spokesman said.
Meanwhile, a Federal Government inquiry into multiculturalism has been swamped with Islamophobic and racist submissions since the weekend riot.
Many of the 513 submissions accepted by the inquiry assert that multiculturalism has failed, that Muslims "refuse to assimilate" and threaten Australia's democracy.
--------------
I can't believe i'm still shocked by the amount of hate out there for us people!
SHOULD THE MOVIE HAVE BEEN MADE? NO
SHOULD THE SYDNEY PROTEST TURNED VIOLENT? NO I really wish that it hadn't perhaps then, just maybe, maybe, one or two people would have realized the stupidity of this film and have backed them up. MAYBE.
IS MUSLIM ANGER JUSTIFIED? YES
WHY ISN'T ANYONE ELSE AGAINST THE MAKING OF THE FILM? BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO BUSY SPREADING WORDS OF HATE ABOUT ISLAM, BELIEVE THAT FREEDOM OF SPEECH MEANS ONE CAN DO WHATEVER THEY LIKE EVEN IF IT HURTS SOMEONE ALTHOUGH IF THIS HAD BEEN AGAINST SOME OTHER RELIGION I'M 1000% THEY WOULD RESPOND THE SAME WAY AND YOU KNOW WHAT NO ONE WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT THE RESPONSE THEY WOULD'VE REMOVED THE MOVIE ALREADY.
@ ninatron many people on this forum as well as not, are defending the film justifying it as 'freedom of speech'.
I never said that anyone should've and should resort to violence. But it happened. What also happened was that film. No one will talk about the film though!
enough said.
Kinda supports the point that religion is not necessary to develop good morals.
http://www.islamicwritings.org/quran/peace/does-the-quran-teach-violence/oh god.. not this again
@ ninatron many people on this forum as well as not, are defending the film justifying it as 'freedom of speech'.
I never said that anyone should've and should resort to violence. But it happened. What also happened was that film. No one will talk about the film though!
enough said.
The fact that you blame the film shows that you think the violence was, in some way, justified. That a mere film, which most of the protestors didn't even SEE, justified the deaths of innocent embassy workers, the damaging of property and the injuring of police.
That to me is a whole lot more disgusting than the film itself.
@ ninatron many people on this forum as well as not, are defending the film justifying it as 'freedom of speech'.
I never said that anyone should've and should resort to violence. But it happened. What also happened was that film. No one will talk about the film though!
enough said.
The fact that you blame the film shows that you think the violence was, in some way, justified. That a mere film, which most of the protestors didn't even SEE, justified the deaths of innocent embassy workers, the damaging of property and the injuring of police.
That to me is a whole lot more disgusting than the film itself.
No ninatron it doesn't show that i justify the violence- it shows that i justify the anger, NOT the VIOLENCE.
As I have said before, I really really wish that the violence hadn't happened and am extremely SORRY for it too. I wish the people who did this had instead thought about a more rational and peaceful way to deal with, it is NOT FAIR that innocent people have been killed in other countries because of this.
It is also NOT FAIR that this movie was made in the first place. But anyways, no one will ever see that, so I guess there is no point in me explaining that.
So where do I stand? well like i've said many times I wish the protest had been different not only here but everywhere else in the world and I only hope that people see that most of us Muslim's sitting at home are quite disappointed about the reaction too, we are also disappointed about the stupid film (which should already be banned). But it is concerning looking at how people have quickly begun to put us all under the same label as 'extremists' etc.
I just hope things calm down, the movie gets deleted and people learn to just respect each other's religion so we can all live peacefully without discrimination and clear channeling of hate towards one religion. I mean what's the point of stupid movie's like that anyway? And when I say this I say it for all religions. We all have different faiths, some don't believe at all but we need to learn to respect each other and be sensitive to each other's feelings. If we all could just give each other some respect and be kind and thoughtful to each other no matter what religion/race/culture etc. this world be a much happier place.
edit:
Also, I don't understand why you are calling for people to focus on the filmmaker immediately after you acknowledged yourself that the film has very little to do with it:
And Tuesday’s poll echoed that experience, with nearly half of American Muslims saying they had experienced religious or racial discrimination within the past year. About one-third of Mormons said that they had faced discrimination, compared to only one-fifth of Jews, Catholics and Protestants.
The decline in the number of attacks in the EU continued in 2011 with a total of 174 attacks in seven Member States.
The majority of the reported terrorist attacks took place in France (85), Spain (47) and the United Kingdom (26). Spain saw the number of separatist attacks decrease by nearly 50% compared to 2010. A total of 484 individuals were arrested for terrorism-related offences.
Not one religiously-inspired terrorist attack on EU territory was reported by Member States, nor were any single-issue terrorist attacks registered. The killing of two American military personnel at Frankfurt airport by a religiously-inspired individual in March 2011 is not a terrorist attack according to German legislation, although the incident clearly carried some such char-acteristics. Of all specified affiliations, the majority of attacks were committed by separatist groups.
Nobody is defending the damn film.
Again, nobody is defending the film. I don't know where you got that from.
A strict reading of the Quran, the traditional scholar's interpretation,and the hadith suggests that they're actions aren't condemned by the good book.
Just look at the imams in Saudia Arabia....you will see that those who are hardcore fundamentalists...
generally endorse these violent acts (especially towards Jews).
I can garauntee you for a fact that those who were protesting in Sydney were the ones who took their religion seriously (going to the mosque continually, reading the quran, reading the hadith, etc.) and those at home watching their fellow brothers and sisters in Islam make a fool of themselves didn't.
Whereas the violent verses in the Quran came later and renounced the peaceful ones. :/
Can you please explain to my why is it we see this type of violent reaction ONLY from Muslims? Why don't Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, or Jews get offended when their religion is portrayed in a negative light, they are as passionate about their religion as Muslims.
But the question is, are people meant to take the Quran THAT seriously? It draws parallels to the verses in the Old Testament (which encouraged some abhorrent things) and the New Testament. People tend to pick and choose the latter. Are these people not taking the Judeo-Christian faith seriously?
However, there is the point that the New Testament comes AFTER the Old Testament and, from my understanding, renounced the Old Testament, whereas the violent verses in the Quran came later and renounced the peaceful ones. :/
Quote from my mum just then: "Do you know any Muslims? Be careful what you say around them! You might get hurt!"
Is this how you want your religion to be perceived? Would you rather be feared or respected?
I think the movie was extremely stupid.. however I support their freedom to make it. The fact of the matter is we can't let freedom of speech that is one of the foundations of our civilization be trumped just because a bunch of thugs get butthurt and can't take criticism.
I think the movie was extremely stupid.. however I support their freedom to make it. The fact of the matter is we can't let freedom of speech that is one of the foundations of our civilization be trumped just because a bunch of thugs get butthurt and can't take criticism.
This is one example of someone being in support of the making of the film, there are many out there, you only have to view the comments people make to realise that people believe that a movie clearly encouraging the mocking of Muslims and instigating HATE towards them is okay to make and was Sam Bacile's RIGHT. I don't believe anyone should have the right to direct SO MUCH HATE towards a group and therefore encourage such behavior in any form whether that be a film or whatever.
Freedom of speech is not "you can say anything but only if <...>", the freedom of speech is "you can say anything" and that's simply it.
This is totally incorrect.
"Exceptions to free speech in the United States are limitations on the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and expression as recognized by the United States Supreme Court. These exceptions have been created over time, based on certain types of speech and expression, and under different contexts. While freedom of speech in the United States is a constitutional right, these exceptions make that right a limited one. Speech that involves incitement, false statements of fact, obscenity, child pornography, threats, and speech owned by others are all completely exempt from First Amendment protections."
<quote from American supreme court case>
personally abusive [word]
such speech must be "directed to the person of the hearer" and is "thus likely to be seen as a 'direct personal insult'The film fails on both of these points:
(which has never been explicitly decided)
would be limited to private figures
The Court held in Hustler v. Falwell (1988) that satire which could be seen as offensive to a "public figure" is fully protected.1) This rule, as well as being American and therefore having nothing to do with us, was never actually decided as a rule and thus cannot be relied upon.
Hahahahahaha omfg I just watched the movie. What on Earth?! How absurd. I see no reason this should come down. It's almost hilarious that people took that shit seriously. What did I even just watch!
Hahahahahaha omfg I just watched the movie. What on Earth?! How absurd. I see no reason this should come down. It's almost hilarious that people took that shit seriously. What did I even just watch!Sam Bacile voice over made the movie for me. Especially when he did the female voices
Not even his name lolHahahahahaha omfg I just watched the movie. What on Earth?! How absurd. I see no reason this should come down. It's almost hilarious that people took that shit seriously. What did I even just watch!Sam Bacile voice over made the movie for me. Especially when he did the female voices
"It's time to stop pandering to bigots - Andrew Bolt'LOL +1
Oh dear...
"It's time to stop pandering to bigots - Andrew Bolt'
Oh dear...
I'd rather hit him over the head with one."It's time to stop pandering to bigots - Andrew Bolt'
Oh dear...
I'm going to buy the guy a big shovel for his birthday.
LOL also, awkward moment when his son was your classmate at school...:| Did people give him shit? Or does that not happen at private schools? LOL
I know it's Andrew Bolt and everything, but did you guys read the article? Actually kinda made some valid points lol.Pay-wall. :-\
I know it's Andrew Bolt and everything, but did you guys read the article? Actually kinda made some valid points lol.Pay-wall. :-\
Do you have an account there though? It requires me to sign in.I know it's Andrew Bolt and everything, but did you guys read the article? Actually kinda made some valid points lol.Pay-wall. :-\
I can see it fine?? http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/its-time-to-stop-pandering-to-bigots/story-e6frfifx-1226477632907
THE most frightening thing said about the Sydney riot against the Innocence of Muslims video wasn't said by a Muslim.
Digital Pass - $5 weekend papers
No, give the booby prize to Communications Minister Stephen Conroy.
His spokesman announced Conroy wanted Google to review its terms of service to consider pulling the clearly offensive clip from YouTube.
Hey, this is exactly what one of the world's top terrorist leaders wants, too.
"The distribution of this entire film must be banned by the Americans," demanded Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Monday.
They slandered the purity of his birth, slandered his faith and his morals.
When our own Communications Minister and a terror chief in Lebanon speak as one about banning an obscure video to placate furious Muslims who haven't seen it, we are already halfway to lost.
Even in America we see this same disgraceful scramble to placate mobs threatening to cut our throats at home or burning Western embassies abroad.
The Obama administration falsely blamed Innocence of Muslims for triggering even a deadly al-Qaida assault on September 11 on the US consulate in Benghazi.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeatedly denounced the ultra-low-budget film, as if it were the cause of the lethal Muslim rage and not the excuse for it.
Meanwhile, US authorities raided the film-maker's home after midnight to take him away for questioning over alleged breaches of this jailbird's probation.
Message received.
Make a film attacking Islam and if you aren't hacked to death in the street like Dutch director Theo van Gogh, your own police could drag you out of your bed.
You'll kill us if we don't remove the film? OK, we'll try.
We'll even rough up the film-maker for you.
You won't have to cut our throats, because we'll cut them for you.
What sort of message does Conroy think he's sending? May as well ask Nasrallah what else he wants banned.
Already, Prime Minister Julia Gillard dutifully echoes Nasrallah's contempt for a film I'm almost certain she's never seen, either, calling Innocence of Muslims truly repulsive.
Repulsive? But that the film is (undoubtedly) bad and rude is no reason to wish it suppressed.
If we let jihadists stop us watching trash, we've let them decide for us what trash is.
Trouble is, for a Nasrallah trash includes even prize-winning novels such as Sir Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses and the illustrations of Danish cartoonists who mocked Islam and Islamic fanatics.
That book and those cartoons were also attacked with a murderous rage.
Rushdie was sentenced to death by Iran and, in this latest orgy of outrage, an Iranian religious foundation upped the reward for his killing to $3.5 million.
One of his translators was murdered, and two others wounded.
The Danish cartoonists have also been hunted by jihadists sent to kill them, and three Muslims were jailed over a bomb plot to punish Denmark for its impiety.
Sadly, such violence has worked.
Rushdie was asked by the British government to write an apology for his novel, and some Leftist intellectuals attacked him for his rudeness.
Australian newspapers still refuse to show the Danish cartoons, and Yale University Press didn't dare publish them even in Jytte Klausen's history, The Cartoons That Shook the World.
How careful our publishers and artists now are not to offend such extremists.
Scholastic Australia scrapped an adventure thriller, Army of the Pure, after booksellers and librarians said they would not stock a book with an Islamist terrorist as the baddie, and the Melbourne Comedy Festival banned two acts that joked about Muslims.
Yes, that's the same festival that's staged Catherine Deveny's foul-mouthed tirade against Christianity, God Is Bulls---.
The only difference: Christians don't kill their critics.
Yet every such concession to threats and demands for censorship just invites more.
First, The Satanic Verses had to be outlawed.
Then the Mohammed cartoons.
Now Innocence of Muslims.
Next, who knows - Dante's Inferno, the great Renaissance masterpiece?
Quick, read it before the likes of Conroy decree even Dante's famous descriptions of the damned in hell are too dangerously offensive:
I saw one there - so burst wide,
From the chin severed down to where we fart ...
Look at Mohammed and his mangled trunk!
And all the other souls you witness here
Sowed scandal, discord, schism when alive,
And therefore they are cloven as you see.
Yes, to hell with bigots who threaten us with death for saying and reading as we please. Give in once, and we'll give in forever.
Trash handed over today, treasure tomorrow.
Personally, I don't see why (even a peaceful) protest over the film is even worth it. If it's to create better awareness of Islam in Australia then there's better means of doing that (and probably would relate to issues irrelevant to this film).
I got to a school where greater than 50% of people are Muslim and there are absolutely no troubles. I fully recognise that the majority of Muslims, like the majority of all people are peaceful. The protests didn't shake my view in the slightest, nor did the video. As far as contravening the 'truth' of Islam, whatever that may be to many, I think the video did a pretty shit job, 'cause I sat through that thing picking apart the terrible editing and acting.
On necessity, the video certainly wasn't and was by all definitions pointless and having free speech doesn't mean we should exercise it. However I think when 'we should be a little bit sensitive' of beliefs etc. we are entering a dangerous field. All ideologies and beliefs need to be challenged to an extent in democracy. The cruelty of belittling prophets lies within the hands of those who are offended; ultimately, no one can offend you without your permission. Pretty tired atm, sorry of that didn't make sense, I'll come back tomorrow lol
Hahahahahaha omfg I just watched the movie. What on Earth?! How absurd. I see no reason this should come down. It's almost hilarious that people took that shit seriously. What did I even just watch!
It just shows how stupid fundamentalists are, LOL!
El2012 +1ed
Quote
El2012 +1ed
This was in regards to the consequences caused by the protest (i.e. the extremists who took it upon themselves to resort to physical violence to police who were simply doing their job). However, I do not hold this view for every muslim and I am aware this is not an accurate representation of all muslims.
Hahahahahaha omfg I just watched the movie. What on Earth?! How absurd. I see no reason this should come down. It's almost hilarious that people took that shit seriously. What did I even just watch!
It just shows how stupid fundamentalists are, LOL!
@ Brenden, I don't think you realise the movie was called 'Innocence of Muslims' or if you do, you don't quite understand it's implications. Basically the person who made this film not only denigrates our beloved Prophet (pbuh) but also suggest that all Muslim's are the way he has portrayed and you expect us not to be hurt by it. Furthermore, what you don't understand is that this person he has mocked means a lot to us (as much as our own parents) and for someone to go ahead and put him in such a negative and disgusting light really hurt's. But you and others (mostly) will never understand either because you don't want to, or you believe behavior like that is perfectly acceptable.
@Paul define fundamentalists? We are all angry by this so are we all STUPID for being angry? we have no right to be angry? YOU'RE STUPID to say the least.
To everyone who is judging Muslims based on some violent protests, for example as Ninatron's mum stated and El2012 +1ed, "do you know any Muslims, be careful what you say to them, you may get hurt", it just makes me think how fast people are to attack Muslims, it's scary really. If you like, don't associate with us, it's as simple as that. You wanna take up the stereotypes so be it. You wanna HATE, so be it. And Nintron i'm not trying to suggest you are judging I understand you put that quote up to demonstrate that people, including your mum, are judging and quickly taking up a negative image of Muslims and I don't believe this is right.
This movie should clearly be banned. It not only denigrates our Prophet but also all Muslims. It questions our humanity and our morals. It questions our being. It encourages people to hate, it promotes a negative image of all Muslims and anything like that whether it be against Islam or any other religion/culture/race should not be acceptable. Anything that suggests a specific group is inferior to all others should not be acceptable. It should be banned so people don't think it's okay to engage in such a racist and ill-intentioned behavior.
Kate's topless pictures were banned (and i don't care if that's somewhere else and blah blah blah) the point is that something like that can be banned but a movie which attacks a group of people and questions their morals/ values cannot be deleted because of freedom of speech. This is just ridiculous, freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of HATE.
All in all this film should be banned, whether it breaches the first amendment or not. And no you will not be giving in to terrorist groups and bigots as Andrew Bolt cleverly suggests to persuade the public that it shouldn't be banned. It is the only correct step, and promotes the respecting of each other. If the film remains, that just demonstrates that it is perfectly okay to pick on a minority group and suggest that these people are inferior and whatnot.
And as yearingforsimplicity states, you can question and disagree but does that mean you can mock, make fun of and degrade people. To question a group's humanity. To encourage people that this sort of disgusting behavior is okay because hey it's 'freedom of speech'.
edit: Herald Sun poll: Was the French magazine in the wrong to publish topless pictures of Kate Middleton?
yes: 2187 (78%)
no: 610 (22%)
I would love to see a poll of : Should the anti-Islamic film trailer be banned which promotes hatred towards Muslims and depicts a negative image of all Muslims not just the prophet?
I hope unlike the majority on AN, people actually think freedom of speech doesn't mean stuff like this should exist, and agree that banning it is the most appropriate action.
Oh an youtube terms and conditions:
We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view. But we don't permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation/gender identity, or their status as a returned soldier).
yet they refuse to remove the film ::) you can't have it both ways you-tube either you encourage hate speech or take the damn thing off!
lol it's not hate speech, it shouldn't be banned.
If you can't see yourself accepting the fact that people will have opinions different to you, and think that it's an appropriate reaction to riot about a movie made by a random idiot that has no effect on society as a whole, then perhaps living in a democratic country which protects its citizens rights is not for you. Just saying.
edit: and tbh, this movie could've been a lot worse. Read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or Mein Kampf, if you want to read REAL hate speech.
lol it's not hate speech, it shouldn't be banned.
If you can't see yourself accepting the fact that people will have opinions different to you, and think that it's an appropriate reaction to riot about a movie made by a random idiot that has no effect on society as a whole, then perhaps living in a democratic country which protects its citizens rights is not for you. Just saying.
edit: and tbh, this movie could've been a lot worse. Read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or Mein Kampf, if you want to read REAL hate speech.
I never said it was an appropriate reaction, but I do believe the film should be banned. And thanks Truck, I was yet to be told 'go back to your country' and now you've even done that. Oh and your going to tell me what the majority of Muslim's think about this film?
Clearly most people on AN believe it should remain on the net and they are immovable on this point then so be it. I shall not waste my time, the people who can c it's inappropriateness would c it others won't.
Oh an youtube terms and conditions:
We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view. But we don't permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation/gender identity, or their status as a returned soldier).
yet they refuse to remove the film ::) you can't have it both ways you-tube either you encourage hate speech or take the damn thing off!
@Paul define fundamentalists? We are all angry by this so are we all STUPID for being angry? we have no right to be angry? YOU'RE STUPID to say the least.
Hahahahahaha omfg I just watched the movie. What on Earth?! How absurd. I see no reason this should come down. It's almost hilarious that people took that shit seriously. What did I even just watch!
It just shows how stupid fundamentalists are, LOL!
I never called him stupid to begin with
Yes, you are stupid for being angry. Very stupid.
Every Muslim. Full of shit. You're asking us not to generalise then generalising yourself. I haven't met someone at school that gives a shit - and yes, I've been talking about it a lot.Hahahahahaha omfg I just watched the movie. What on Earth?! How absurd. I see no reason this should come down. It's almost hilarious that people took that shit seriously. What did I even just watch!
It just shows how stupid fundamentalists are, LOL!
Paul, Brenden suggested that there was no reason for anyone to take the movie seriously (you insult our prophet and we're not supposed to take it seriously?) then you said this shows how stupid fundamentalists are.
But hey, every Muslim is offended by this and did take it seriously, does that make us all fundamentalists and stupid. That was my point, and dude I wasn't literally asking for the definition of fundamentalist.
Paul, Brenden suggested that there was no reason for anyone to take the movie seriously (you insult our prophet and we're not supposed to take it seriously?) then you said this shows how stupid fundamentalists are.
But hey, every Muslim is offended by this and did take it seriously, does that make us all fundamentalists and stupid. That was my point, and dude I wasn't literally asking for the definition of fundamentalist.
I never called him stupid to begin with
Yes, you are stupid for being angry. Very stupid.
???
It just shows how stupid fundamentalists are, LOL!
TBH I think everyone's expressed their point of views, this thread has merely become a repeat of what we have previously said.