Late Night Thread

[Gloamglozer]

Heh, I've bet him once!
Gloamglozer - If you're "The Walking VTAC Guide" can you help me via PM? <3?

Any time mate.  Just fly me a PM and I'll get back to you asap.

EDIT:  And for those who are wondering, yes, I am very "upset".  lol

[TrueTears]

lol im in perth participating in AUG, there's no internet here -_- free internet @ maccas FTW haha....

anyways any style is good as long as you feel comfortable.

[crayolé]

Any takers for tonight? ;3

[RainerWolfram]

Any takers for tonight? ;3

I was born for it

[Hutchoo]

Any takers for tonight? ;3

I was born for it

04:25:07 AM
sooo late/early haha!

Ffs, I'm never sleeping past 5 ever again.. I woke up at 5pm today

[TrueTears]

back in melb, ready for some late night maths again!

[Mao]

Reporting in tonight for chemistry report.

[ninwa]

French essay here.

Kill me now...

[m@tty]

Procrastination here.

[kakar0t]

The faceless manifestation of awesomeness in the thread-izzay.

[Mulan]

YO
me so sleepy...

[Mao]

Who wants to read the intro to my chemistry report? (there's not a lot of chemistry in there, I just need someone who can actually speak English to proof it )

I will epic-karma. <3

[shinny]

1. You've spelled presence as 'prescence' in the intro.
2. You're using Vancouver it seems but you've started numbering at 8? Or is this something you're going to just clean up at the end (which is what I normally do, ignore if so).
3. A bit ambiguous when you say 'of this field' as to which field you're referring to. The hydrophobic effect? The molecular origin of the hydrophobic effect?
4. Maybe say 'the hydrophobicity of ice'? Doesn't really matter.

Other than that, seems fine.

[Mao]

1. You've spelled presence as 'prescence' in the intro.
2. You're using Vancouver it seems but you've started numbering at 8? Or is this something you're going to just clean up at the end (which is what I normally do, ignore if so).
3. A bit ambiguous when you say 'of this field' as to which field you're referring to. The hydrophobic effect? The molecular origin of the hydrophobic effect?
4. Maybe say 'the hydrophobicity of ice'? Doesn't really matter.

Other than that, seems fine.

THANKS MAN =]

1. I blame LaTeX and its inability to spell-check (by that, I mean I haven't bothered to install it)
2. I also blame LaTeX, I haven't bothered to ask my supervisor how he does it

3. The report is meant to aim at an academic in the field, I'm going to guess they'll understand I'm talking about electric fields in a paper about electrical permittivity
4. Sticking with this one, following the trend of semi-coherent English in all these papers I have in front of me.

[TrueLight]

the first " is the wrong way around for all of them i think

the second reference... canadian journal of ...?

oh kageesus i was skimming through it and im like the wadda wadda does the watta watta?? oO

don't you just love referencing...