NOTE: Do not use personal pronouns in your essays. Ever.Topic:Parents have no rights to control their child’s life who is at 16 or over 16.
We see adolescents in today’s era as people who hardly stay home and stay with their friends outside
(based off what?), but do we really know what they are doing? Parents need to control their child’s life as the child can lead to a prosperous and happy life
(pretty vague). The parent also needs to monitor their child to prevent him/her from doing drugs
(how? give an outline).The parent also needs to prevent their child from doing thefts or terrorist attacks.
(...seriously?)First and foremost, parents should control their child’s life so the child leads to a happy and prosperous life.Many children drop out at year ten so they can relax and not study in the future
is this anecdotal? where are you getting this from?. The child can just keep spending their parents money and have not much knowledge
too vague. They would have to do jobs in the future such as pushing trolleys, cleaning toilets and even being jobless
(why are you disparaging trolley pushers and toilet cleaners? are you saying that 'dropouts' resolve to work as them? these are real jobs!). But If a parent is closely monitoring their life, they can force their child to do further studies. Those further studies will most likely make the child do a good job that gives good money
(example...). More money leads to living a prosperous life and not having to suffer at old age because of money issues
(bad argument, does money buy happiness?).
Money also leads you to having your dream house built so one can be happy (Not a good point at all). With this in mind, parents should control their child’s life even if they are over sixteen so the child can lead to having a great job and leading to a happy and prosperous life. (you need to stop regurgitating what you wrote before into your conclusion. word it differently next time)In addition, a parent should monitor their child’s life so the parent can prevent the child from doing drugs. Many adolescents are curious about drugs
(proof?). That ask themselves many questions,such as ‘what are drugs’?,’why are they addicting’?, or even ‘I should try them out’. Once an adolescent has tried a drug,they become addicted to the drug (
(give me an example!!! you're acting as if any adolescent that has tried a drug for the first time is hooked instantly), which also leads to them to dying at a early age?
Who wants to die at a early age?(don't include this) Drugs also lead to waste of money as many drugs are expensive and people are constantly buying them.Take cigarettes for example,many people are buying them everyday (
(again, where are you getting this?),and a 24 pack cigarette is over $150.If any person buys them for 10 years,a 24 pack per week it would lead to a massive $7800 gone in waste. All of this would not happen if the parent warns the child to not take drugs
(super weak, where's the emphasis in this phrasing?). If the child still wants drugs, the parents can ground them
(you really think grounding them works 100% of the time?). This means that the child will eventually stop thinking about drugs
(What??? Are you sure?). A parent can change an adolescent’s life. Hence, parents have the right to control their child’s life as the parent can prevent the child from doing drugs.
Finally,parents can prevent their child from doing a terrorism attack or theft.
(come on man, seriously?) Take a moment and think, have you seen a teenage group doing something dodgy while you were walking down the pathway or walking out of a shopping centre? Well,most of us have. Many adolescents are doing some thefts and even terrorism attacks. Believe it or not,young sixteen years old who should be studying for a test are, instead, planning the next terrorism attack. Many people wonder ‘why do they do it’?Or ‘what do they get from it’. But no one asks the main question, why are not their parents stopping them from doing these attacks or thefts? This is because the parent thinks its acceptable for adolescebts to do whatever they want at the age of sixteen. However,if the parent closely monitors their child and prevents the child from meeting the ‘bad’ kids who do these thefts with him,this world would have a much less crime rate. Therefore, parents need to control their child’s life so the child does not do a terrorist attack or theft.
I'm sorry, but at this stage, your points are getting comical instead of persuasive. Just read this point for yourself 'Believe it or not,young sixteen years old who should be studying for a test are, instead, planning the next terrorism attack.'
Many people argue that some parents are too strict and they basically choose a life for their child. However, the child obviously has a right to talk if the parent is planning too choose their life partner for him/her without permission. That is way too extreme. Strict parents can also change their child’s life for the better. No parent would want their child to be sad or homeless. Hence, parents can be too strict but they usually do it for the better.
To conclude, parents should have control over their child’s life even if the child is 16 or over as it leads to having a prosperous and happy life. If parents control their child’s life,it also prevents the child from doing drugs. It even prohibits their child from doing terrorist attacks or thefts.- Minor improvements from last time.
- Did you plan your last point out? It was not good at all. Really man? 16 year olds planning terrorist attacks instead of studying?
-
STOP making your essays based on your thoughts man, use facts.
- Next time, plan out your essay,
AND THEN ask yourself whether it's logical or not