I guess we interpret things differently 
Mark Kelly haha, "Ask themselves if they are feeling uncomfortable because of an ethical quandary, or whether it was just the curry they had for lunch."
Yeahhh.. I don't think he likes the exam much 
"Hey, I like the way you don't let morality stand in the way of profit. Can I buy shares in your company?" lol
I also liked the suggestion for the IT workers to "ask their mothers"... It sounds pretty apt for a section of the IT industry

I wrote down that the IT workers should not worry about it unless the work is illegal. Really, in that case study, you are a client of the business Cheryl works for, and when you are in that situation, you have to do what the company wants, not always what you think is best. Having said that, the IT workers have a responsibility to ensure that what they are doing is legal, and to avoid any illegal activity.
Mark Kelly got Question 11a wrong?
i put =(G6-B6)
because it asks for the weeks growth compared to the week before? he just adds them all...
Yeah, thats what I wrote.
Same here. He is wrong because C6:G6 tracked the height of the plants, not the difference in height. Even if you missed the column headers, you could tell that by looking at the data in H6. 15 is definitely not the sum of CG:G6...
Good exam though, quite challenging, disappointed about the lack of VLOOKUPS, (REPLACED with a nested IF wtf?!?? was not expecting that one D: ) and lack of questions on laws.
Haha same here.
I think Mark made a few mistakes, although I'm sure these were typos:
Question 11 MC
He says PDFs aren't image files, yet the answer he gives (D) includes pdf. I think he meant to say C.
Yep, well spotted there.
Question 16 MC
He says they're links between common primary keys, yet many of the fields he links weren't primary keys. They were unique and *could have* been primary keys, but they didn't feature the key symbol beside them. His answer was A, but I think it should have been B.
I picked A because all the relationships were either one to many or many to one, but I think you have a point there...
Question 3 MC
He says a keyboard swipe doesn't exist, but what's this? http://www.google.com.au/images?q=keyboard%20swipe&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1028&bih=869. It looks like a mobile keyboard an unauthorised user would type his password into. Furthermore, his answer, CCTV, wouldn't have the video quality to see what was occurring on a screen. It might not even be facing the screen and would almost definitely be too far away, and its view may be even covered by the hacker 's body too.
Ooo, good find, though I find it odd that the exam writers would refer to such a relatively obscure technology that none of us have really ever heard of. I do agree that CCTV would not be accurate for the purpose, and the other methods do not make any sense. I suppose we'll have to wait for the examiner's report on that one...