Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

January 03, 2026, 05:50:41 pm

Author Topic: Bozo's queries  (Read 19686 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #135 on: October 29, 2011, 02:38:52 pm »
0
and it can only go from ground state up yeah?
i.e. cant go from n=2 to n = 3?
edit: removed incorrect stuff, refer to xZero's post
« Last Edit: October 29, 2011, 03:17:00 pm by laseredd »

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #136 on: October 29, 2011, 03:08:35 pm »
0
umm i dont think it can jump from n=2 to n=3, it must go up from ground state but when it drops down it can go from n=3 to n=2 etc.
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #137 on: October 29, 2011, 03:15:35 pm »
0
umm i dont think it can jump from n=2 to n=3, it must go up from ground state but when it drops down it can go from n=3 to n=2 etc.
:|

I better get back to studying in that case.

Sorry for telling you the wrong thing Harvey.

edit: fixed annoying typo
« Last Edit: October 29, 2011, 04:05:03 pm by laseredd »

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #138 on: October 29, 2011, 07:57:52 pm »
0
It can jump from n=2 to n=3, but in VCE physics, we assume it does not purely because its a 1 in 1000 chance. That's what the chief assessor at TSFX physics said.

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #139 on: October 29, 2011, 08:04:33 pm »
0
according to my lecturer, it cant because there's no atom in the n=2 state, or simply atoms in n=2 state transitions back to n=1 too fast to absorb enough energy to jump up a state :S im all confused
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #140 on: October 29, 2011, 09:26:17 pm »
0
It can jump from n=2 to n=3, but in VCE physics, we assume it does not purely because its a 1 in 1000 chance. That's what the chief assessor at TSFX physics said.

according to my lecturer, it cant because there's no atom in the n=2 state, or simply atoms in n=2 state transitions back to n=1 too fast to absorb enough energy to jump up a state :S im all confused

I don't think those two statements contradict too much. If it transitions too fast to absorb enough energy to jump up the state, there is still a small tiny chance that it might actually absorb enough energy? I'm not sure if 1 in 1000 is the actual probability or not.

Also, I didn't realise that Bruce Walsh does stuff for TSFX :| Or did they get a new chief assessor this year?

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #141 on: October 29, 2011, 09:37:35 pm »
0
Geoff Davies. He was the chief assessor this year. I can't remember though cause he said it was for one of the units only. It may have been last unit. So he's probably the chief assistant now.

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #142 on: October 29, 2011, 11:15:07 pm »
0
Who here has done Lisachem 2011. I don't get sound q2 and q3. Can anyone clarify?

paulsterio

  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4803
  • I <3 2SHAN
  • Respect: +430
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #143 on: October 29, 2011, 11:19:18 pm »
0
Also, I didn't realise that Bruce Walsh does stuff for TSFX :| Or did they get a new chief assessor this year?

Yeah, I thought Bruce was the Chief Assessor as well? :S

cranberry

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +5
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #144 on: October 30, 2011, 07:37:18 pm »
0
Who here has done Lisachem 2011. I don't get sound q2 and q3. Can anyone clarify?

attach it up and ill be glad to have a ping :)....im redoing phys exams cause i got no new ones
Master of Civil Engineering and Bachelor of Science at the University of Melbourne

VCE:
2010: Revolutions [36]
2011: English 45, Legal Studies 38, Physics 37, Chemistry 34, Methods 36

94.85

HarveyD

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 575
  • Respect: +11
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #145 on: October 31, 2011, 12:34:43 am »
0
just wondering:
for this question, in the table, we would give the peak voltage yeah?

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #146 on: October 31, 2011, 07:24:00 am »
0
just wondering:
for this question, in the table, we would give the peak voltage yeah?
Yeah, X and Y are located at the locations of the peak voltages.

HarveyD

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 575
  • Respect: +11
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #147 on: November 01, 2011, 12:47:10 pm »
0
another quick question
with a question like this
where it asks for the force direction acting on side X-Y

I know its clear that its into the page when you use the right rule etc
but if you said the force was acting "down", would that be wrong?
because thats how it works in real life? since they tell you its a motor....

iroflmfao

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #148 on: November 01, 2011, 12:55:24 pm »
0
You could always give them the pages you want to print from each pdf.

Printing at school = free.
Half pages = bonuses prints.

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326
Re: Bozo's queries
« Reply #149 on: November 01, 2011, 05:51:01 pm »
0
another quick question
with a question like this
where it asks for the force direction acting on side X-Y

I know its clear that its into the page when you use the right rule etc
but if you said the force was acting "down", would that be wrong?
because thats how it works in real life? since they tell you its a motor....
I think down might refer to when  - how do I explain this? uhh, so fingers pointing into the page, thumb pointing left and your palm faces 'down' (in other words, along X to Y). I think that direction would be considered down in this case.

If it was one of those drawings where it's not flat, but it's like a perspective drawing (I hope you know which ones I'm talking about, e.g. like the usual VCAA ones) - I think then it's alright to use the word 'downwards'. To be safe, I use 'vertically downwards' - I saw it used somewhere (assessor reports possibly, don't quote me on that).

edit: Don't forgot about the direction key/little compass thing if they give you one. Always go by the wording given, if provided.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2011, 05:52:58 pm by laseredd »