Ok firstly.
Theres nothing like seeing Australia getting thrashed
Thats what you said, and I wasn't arguing Australia lost. What I was saying was that they didn't get thrashed as they actually won more games than India throughout the series. Get your facts straight. Actually reading what I said wouldn't go astray.

Secondly.
Dont try to defend a team that employs dirty tactics(sledging, racism) to win a game and then boast about their own superiority.
So Australia are the dirty team after last summer are they? Hmmm... Harbajan Singh calling Andrew Symonds a monkey.. that ring a bell to you mate?
Sledging is a part of most sports, and there is nothing wrong with it providing it doesn't get personal and or overstep boundaries(race, religion etc.). However, it's a bit rich to call Australia racist when we all know Harbajan called Symonds a monkey on MORE than one occassion, the latter of which was last summer.
Don't kid yourself. All teams sledge. It's easy to point the finger at Australia because of their complete and utter dominance of all forms of cricket in the past decade, hence other teams/nations will not like them and call them "cocky" etc.
Thirdly.
The Australian cricket team is pathetic now. Most of the experienced players have left and now it's up to players like brad haddin and Brett lee to carry the team. Everyone knows that the australian team is quickly declining and imo the team will be nothing in another ten years.
Pathetic? Lost all experienced players? Sounds more like India to me.
Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman and Virenda Sehwag are ALL RETIRING in the next year or too. Australia have a huge pool of talent to chose from so you can tell yourself all you like that they will be shit but it won't come true. Granted, Warne, McGrath, Langer, Gilchrist etc will all be huge losses but the domestic competition has enough depth to cover these holes made, and nuture through the next superstars of cricket.